|
Kathmandu Supreme Court 'contempt of court' crimes UCPN-Maoist Chairman Prachanda Center sent a written reply today.
The Supreme Court on behalf of her house as the representative of the trustee Mani Pokharel Dahal contempt of court case before the Supreme Court have submitted a written reply.
In a written reply filed by exposure to something for the referring court is called abuse, "the applicant in question seems to come to dhyaya filed, your Bible is not lawful for the court, can not be misused."
When the application has been filed in question come purely objective, even in the bosom of the liquidation application is mentioned in a written reply.
He spoke in the capital on April 31 with a program topic using your friendly language alters the write / to write a written reply stating that work is called, "the work of bringing the issue of the applicant himself have the opposite court. '
Aftermath of the conflict with the spirit of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and the agreement of mutual recognition and should be marmaanurupa level Truth and Reconciliation Commission has also written to both parties agree that a known answer is mentioned.
Point number 27 on both sides of the comprehensive peace agreement and the ruling party and the agitating political clout due to the issue in question claimed that the complaint back to the issue and the immediate release of imprisoned inmates position will be publicly mentioned by suniscitasameta.
Chairman Dahal last April 31 in the capital center speaking on the topic of seeking to interfere with the judicial process, saying that contempt of court on May 3 Advocate Dinesh Tripathi had filed an application before the Supreme Court.
Chairman Dahal opposition created a petition filed court action against the Peace Agreement was mentioned in court for garekojasta expression.
Democracy, freedom of petition, the court struck nyayalayamathi manahani of the Former Maoist legal action was demanded.
The petition, on May 11 on a single bench of Acting Chief Justice Sushila Karki contempt of court case itself or its representatives Dahal three days in court had ordered to send a written reply.
Dahal had the same orders that the court's written reply to the letter on June 16 received and the date of receipt of the written reply today, the Supreme Court had sent three days.
Dahal, president of the court expressed concern about the defamation of a serious neglect of the kind of offensive about a year in prison and a fine of Rs 10 thousand was also demanded.
|
|