|
The Supreme Council of the Office of the Prime Minister and the opposition created anantaraja advocate, Kedar The Supreme Court, Manoj Khadka, pravindraraja petition filed jointly reader Rudra Joshi and the two parties to implement the agreement as unconstitutional is not-to refrain from demanding mandamus.
In contrast to the concept of an independent judiciary and the constitution comply with the request without even an agreement is mentioned.
Prime Minister Oli and Maoist Chairman Dahal, April 23-point agreement, including the implementation of the constitution was.
INSEC objection
CPN-UML and UCPN-Maoist, some clauses of the agreement on Thursday on a nine-point Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) has objected to.
INSEC chairman Subodh Pyakurel Monday release a few points out of a two-party agreement between the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and the Supreme Court has mentioned the paramadesaviruddha.
INSEC agreed on 18 January 2071 that it would not give immunity to perpetrators of serious crimes against the Supreme Court has stated that mandamus.
Agreement No. 3 to illustrate the Comprehensive Peace Agreement marmaanurupa transitional justice work, including concrete timetable to amend the law within 15 days, including the process forward was mentioned gareke. Also, the point of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Commission to investigate the disappeared persons and the faint floral works of the conflict still waiting for justice to make the kind of statement is more upset.
A similar point has been mentioned in No. 7 in armed conflict and political reasons and at different times to withdraw the case and apologized for the initiative to waive the days of the agreement has been opposed. INSEC conflict the facts public and to bring legal action against anyone involved in a crime that the government has demanded.
|